Maclive.net:: Windows Vista: A Revolution in Information Access?
Windows Vista: A Revolution in Information Access? from smanke's Personal Posts
January 6, 2006
|
Eden has done it again. Here's another video to help put Bill Gates and the gang at Microsoft back where they belong. Windows Vista has been designed from the ground up to make information more accessible. It has been designed around the concept of parental control.
Windows Vista has been delayed time after time. Now we know where the software engineers have been spending their time. They are trying to put the finishing touches on these revolutionary concepts in personal computing. I am counting down the days until Vista ships... sometime near the end of 2006. How will we pass the time? Thanks again, Eden. Another home run! Update: 1/7/06 11:30amSorry, I had goofed up the video link above and was playing episode 1 again. That has been corrected. I have to be more careful with the late night updates. Update: 1/8/06 12:33amJust a progress update on the last two Windows Vista posts... The site is taking a world class pounding. We have set a new record for page views in a 24 hour period. On the upside, we are still running strong. And, for those who care, I am hosting the site on a 1.25GHz Mac Mini. The video is linked to a godaddy.com account for faster access. Since we have been hosting the video on a co-located server, we are dangerously close to running out of bandwidth. As a result, I have been forced to replace the QuickTime movies with copies pulling from youtube.com. The quality is lower, and for that I apologize. It was either this, or remove the video all together. Youtube.com might load a little slower, but it should keep us from running out of bandwidth. If you experience other problems with the video, please post a comment and I will find another solution. Once the traffic dies down, I will relink the QuickTime version of the files for anyone who wants to save the downloads. Update: 1/11/06 10:17amI just posted Episode #3. Check it out here. -- Steve
|
|
By smanke at 11:15 PM
|
Comments: 92 |
|
By Richard on January 7, 2006 at 12:06 AM
uhm.. it's the same movie
|
|
By rollo on January 7, 2006 at 2:20 AM
what he said
|
|
By MacUser on January 7, 2006 at 6:37 AM
lol :D
|
|
By mockuser on January 7, 2006 at 7:40 AM
Apart from the own goal well done goodshow old bean
|
|
By Steve on January 7, 2006 at 11:30 AM
Sorry, everyone. I made a typo in the source and linked to episode 1. I just fixed
it. episode 2 works now.
|
|
By nope on January 7, 2006 at 4:07 PM
no it doesn't
|
|
By beefyfigure on January 7, 2006 at 4:16 PM
Amateurs....
|
|
By Anonymous on January 7, 2006 at 4:51 PM
Read this you assholes:
-------------------------------
Vista's visual
theme looks and acts nothing like OS X's "steel and jellybeans" theme. The Windows file
browser and Finder are drastically different. Flip 3D is more akin to Alt-Tab than Expose.
The taskbar in Vista shows live previews of EVERY window when you mouse over its name
while the OS X dock only show live previews of minimized windows. Alt-Tab has been
injected with the same instant-live-preview functionality (of course, this was available
in XP through a Microsoft plug-in, but no one really uses it)...this is not present in the
OS X application switching interface. The Sidebar, and accompanying gadgets, are
Microsoft's take on the Konfabulator engine (I hate to break it to you but Apple didn't
invent or popularize widgets, gadgets, or whatever else you want to call these
mini-applications).
|
|
By Steve on January 7, 2006 at 5:03 PM
Looks like we stuck a nerve with Anonymous.
All options are welcome here. :-)
|
|
By Dan on January 7, 2006 at 5:19 PM
Is this really necessary? I've done casual usage, I was a gamer for a while, and I've
had to use my computer for professional and educational purposes too.
I've used
Dos, Windows 95 to XP, MacOS 6 to 10(x), and hell, i'm even trying to learn to use Linux.
And you know what? None are perfect. Programs are tools and the OS no different.
Doesn't matter who makes your ratchet, hammer, or wrench. What matters is it does the job.
And even moreso, what matters is the job you use it for.
Apple may never become
the gamer's choice, Microsoft will never be infallible. Why? Because we use them.
I like Mac's lack of vulnerability, but I know it's because there's an almost non-existant
amound of little hackers and malicious code-monkeys who care enough to mess with only 1-2%
of us as opposed to 97% or so.
Same reason why Windows isn't perfect. It does have
geniuses at it's helm, but really, it's being crushed under the weight of it's own sucess.
And Linux... Well Linux is cool, I can respect it, but I prolly won't be sailing
any KDE/Gnome flags anytime soon. =P
It's cool that y'all are passionate about how
you use your computers, but come on, I want healthy competition to motivate all 3 camps to
do their best. I hope we'll never have a clear winner, cuz no one OS or programs or
computer will suit everyone's needs. But with all 3 pushing to outdo eachother, you can be
almsot certain that whatever operating system you use, THEY'LL be fighting for your
approval, not us fighting in their stead.
And notice how I managed to stay polite
during my long-winded, opinionated and uesless speech? That's how you do it. ;-P
|
|
By DFG on January 7, 2006 at 5:30 PM
Anonymous is just lashing out at the world due to all that pent up frustration from
having to work on a windoze machine all those years. Oh yeah, and he's urked that once
again the "new" windoze version isn't offering any truely innovative features. MS is just
riding Apples coat-tails as always. Apple does it first, and Apple does it better.
Anonymous, I hate to break it to you but MS didn't create MS-DOS the basis for your
antiquated OS. It was created by Seattle Computer Products and was called QDos, as in
"quick and dirty operating system. How does it feel to have at the heart of your OS
something called quick and dirty. I'll take my elegant and refined OS X any day of the
week
|
|
By raitata on January 7, 2006 at 5:45 PM
hah, who said ms-dos is the basis for windows? that was years ago... i have to agree
with Dan though, we all benefit for having competitors in the OS market, and as a
windows-user i'm really looking forward to Vista (i don't really care that mac os x has
some of the features already..)
|
|
By Anti-anonymous on January 7, 2006 at 5:48 PM
"Apple didn't invent or popularize widgets, gadgets, or whatever else you want to call
these mini-applications"
Um- ever heard of Desk Accessories 'asshole'? Apple
certainy invented those mini-applications or whatever you want to call them.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 7, 2006 at 6:00 PM
DFG, I have to take the joke that you left open here - I'd rather have an OS built on
something that's quick and dirty rather than one built on something that doesn't have any
(eunuchs).
Yeah, it's a bad joke - but I agree with Dan, not only in style but in
content.
DFG - your comment and Anonymous are the same style with different
content, try to step a level above someone who refers to you as an "asshole."
|
|
By Stevo on January 7, 2006 at 6:37 PM
If Apple does it better... than please explain why it's not as popular as MS and
Windows.
(Don't give me stuff like "Apple does it first, and better... blah
blah"). Just facts... like a Steve Jobs keynote address
|
|
By Anonymous on January 7, 2006 at 6:44 PM
"Anonymous, I hate to break it to you but MS didn't create MS-DOS the basis for your
antiquated OS."
Thanks for breaking the news to me genious. I am not arguing who
copied who (Xerox, Konfabulator etc. etc.). I am just talking about what people really use
in the "real world"... not the MacCandy Fantasy land you guys seem to be sedated in.
Don't get me wrong, Apple's computers are nice fashion statements, worthing of every
Hollywood appearance they get. But in the "real" real world, I'd prefer using something
that has the penetration level of MS Windows, even Linux. (I use both.)
And lastly
for the jerkoff who's been "building computers" for the part 30 years... how many of them
were Macs?
|
|
By Tour guide on January 7, 2006 at 6:57 PM
Hi Stevo, and welcome to the Internet!
You'll find many amazing things here,
thanks to your superior web browser, Internet Explorer! Of course, your first stop should
be windowsupdate.com to patch a few holes.
Next, be sure to monitor remaining
exploits and be sure not to visit those sites that threaten Microsoft's credib^D
supremecy.
Remember, not all web authors adhere to our high standards (developed
in-house under tight security at Redmond!), so you'll want to avoid any nasty pages that
say CSS2, W3C, or PNG on them!
Look out for tab-based browsing in the next release
and remember - you saw it FIRST from the duplic^D innovators at Microsoft.
Happy
browsing with Internet Explorer - the world's MOST POPULAR and therefore BEST browser.
|
|
By simX on January 7, 2006 at 7:10 PM
Quoth Anonymous: "I'd prefer using something that has the penetration level of MS
Windows, even Linux."
Bahahahahahahaha. You're not serious, are you? Macs have a
higher "penetration level" (i.e.: market share) than Linux. If you seriously think you're
using a "mainstream" OS when you use Linux, you're seriously deluded.
|
|
By poo on January 7, 2006 at 7:15 PM
shit
|
|
By Jimbo on January 7, 2006 at 7:18 PM
The idea that Mac OS is some kind of "toy" compared to Windows because it's beautiful
is screwy. Mac OS has Unix under the hood, and is therefore powerful and nice to use if
you're a power user, with the added bonus of lots of GUI goodness that Linux doesn't have.
Windows is probably OK for developers too, but it seems ugly and kludgy compared to Unix.
|
|
By ed on January 7, 2006 at 7:52 PM
"If Apple does it better... than please explain why it's not as popular as MS and
Windows."
It's not as popular or widely used, because every PC you get from
anywhere comes loaded with MS Windows, with users rarely having an opportunity to decide
what they want loaded onto their new machines.
|
|
By caldaean on January 7, 2006 at 7:53 PM
Anonymous: "I'd prefer using something that has the penetration level of MS Windows"
I personally prefer NOT to use anything with the penetration level of MS Windows.
Oh, and about the comment regarding the application switcher. Expose is in my opinion
a application switcher, since that what people use it for, and i do see all windows
updating in realtime, all the time.
Stevo: Because it is rarely the best product
that wins. More oftenly it is the one with the smartest way of getting it on the market.
Example: The better BetaMax was beaten by the more expensive VHS.
|
|
By Frank on January 7, 2006 at 9:26 PM
great site!,
windows is more popular than Mac because of three letters; "I",
"B" & "M".
But just imagine if the roles were reversed for a second and Mac had
95% market share, and microsoft had 5% market share - microsoft would shrivel up and die
in an instant!
If Mac get a critical mass of say 30% market share then microsoft
are history.
|
|
By Maxwell Edison on January 7, 2006 at 10:10 PM
"your first stop should be windowsupdate.com to patch a few holes."
The only
reason you don't have so many worms, viruses, etc. on Macs is the same reason you can't
get the amount of software that's available for MS-based systems - nobody wants to program
for the Mac, not even virus creators.
|
|
By ed on January 7, 2006 at 10:19 PM
"nobody wants to program for the Mac, not even virus creators."
It is to my
understanding that the latest Mac version of MS Office is actually better, and has more
features than the Windows counterpart.
Although it's true that there are not as
many games out for Mac, if you take a look at any of the major software titles, there will
almost definitely be a Mac version
(sorry: I should stick on topic of the upcoming
vista)
|
|
By Fritzmeister on January 7, 2006 at 11:13 PM
Well now, the real beauty of Windows is the ease in which it accumulates adware,
spyware, malware and viruses. Let's take the average user who buys Windows' machine, sets
it up, and makes a broadband Internet connection. I'll wager that within a week, they're
overwhelmed with the above-mentioned pirates. That makes it really nice for me, because I
can rid your equipment at a cost. And, in many cases, as most of the Windows' users know,
a complete repair just wouldn't be effective with a hard drive reformat. So, you best buy
some serious protective software with that new box, but that's just not necessary in the
Mac world. Now let's move along to another subject: varying costs of system software.
There's one price for the Home Edition and there's yet another price for the Pro Edition.
And in the Mac world? There's one operating system and one price.
|
|
By JEB on January 8, 2006 at 12:33 AM
The top five Windows problems:
1) Viruses. 2) Infections. 3) Spyware. 4)
Trojans. 5) Adware.
What a perfect acronym for the latest from Redmond!
|
|
By Steve on January 8, 2006 at 12:37 AM
I just posted an update to the end of the story above. It explains why the QuickTime
movies have been replaced with Flash based versions.
Thank you all for your
comments they are a lot of fun to read!
|
|
By Tour guide on January 8, 2006 at 2:50 AM
Hi Max, welcome to the Internet. Let's take a look at your post:
"The only
reason you don't have so many worms, viruses, etc. on Macs is the same reason you can't
get the amount of software that's available for MS-based systems - nobody wants to program
for the Mac, not even virus creators."
I should note that one heads to
WindowsUpdate.com not only to patch the OS, but most especially to patch the browser. So,
in a sense, your complaint departs from the point of my post, namely, that popular does
not mean better, as illustrated by an IE is to Firefox (Opera, Safari, ...) as Windows is
to OS X analogy.
Now for your silly assertions:
Assertion #1: There is
only one reason Macs don't have viruses/worms/etc.
Hah. As if. By the way, are you
currently logged in as Administrator? Got ActiveX enabled? Using IE? Do you use Outlook?
Enabled macros? Ever heard of UNIX?
Assertion #2: "you can't get the amount of
software that's available for MS-based systems" - ie. it's quantity not quality of
software that contributes to viruses.
As an aside, none of the software I'm
interested exists/runs well in Windows (including Halo 2, goddamnit). Yes, I'm serious.
No, I don't speak for everyone.
Assertion #3: "nobody wants to program for the
Mac, not even virus creators"
This is rediculous, and saying such things don't
make them true. Programming for the Mac (in Java, Cocoa, or whatever floats your boat) is
fast, easy, and free. (Yes, I program for UNIX and OS X, and Windows when I feel
self-loathing)
As for market share, you should consider the current trend in
consumers. MS has market share, but a good chunk of it is old computers. The trend is away
from Microsoft and towards Apple (or maybe you'd not like to find out how your MSFT shares
are working for you).
|
|
By mioticdrug.com on January 8, 2006 at 3:42 AM
why do people get all nervous with this posts.. insulting everybody.. chill out.. its
just for the laught. take care
|
|
By Stevo on January 8, 2006 at 9:27 AM
Tour guide, you need to stop repeating yourself and learn how to spell.
And
please back your theories with facts, you're practically the first person I have heard
saying that "the trend is away from Microsoft and towards Apple"... yeah sure, the single
Apple store that sells Macs in my local mall always has a line... and BestBuy isn't
selling a PC every 2 minutes.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 8, 2006 at 12:39 PM
I always wondered why Windows fanboys seem to love MS so much. I guess it's the deep
'penetration' that only Ballmer can provide.
|
|
By golchev.com on January 8, 2006 at 1:09 PM
Hey Stevo, first sorry for my bad english, cause I am not a native speaker. I switched
about 2 years ago and I can really say that the trend is away from Microsoft - I am
looking at my friends - once they used my PowerMac for about 5-10 minutes they got so
excited and are planning to get one soon. Two of them already did and they are extremely
happy, because it works stable, it's user friendly and you can do the same things you
already did on your windows pc and even more. I do not know why you do not believe the
fact that more and more users are switching to the Macintosh platform but if I were you I
would read some mac news first and then talk. You see - more than 1.5 million people
switched in 2005 and they will get even more if the Intel-Switch go fine.
For
those of you, who protect Windows - you can work with it if you want. I have no problem
with that. I stopped doing it and I never reinstalled my OS for 2 years, system crashed
maybe 2-3 times and what it's more impontant - my work got better, faster and more
efficient. For two years now I love every single minute sitting infront of the computer...
Get a Macintosh and you will feel the meaning of the words quality, innovation,
stability and user friendly interface... and hey... it even looks great :)
For the
movie - nice job! I laughed a lot and... ONE MORE THING, Stevo. I read a professional
review a few weeks ago and it was said that the Vista OS will present features to the its
users in 2006, that since 2005 are part of the Mac OS X 10.4... So, no surprise that
videos like this entartain us :)
|
|
By Steve on January 8, 2006 at 1:31 PM
I have been reading through these posts, and it is interesting to see everyone's take
on this. Because I have use Mac OS, Linux, and Windows I think it is fair for me to
comment. I would rank Mac OS as the best operating system, really those at 1 Infinite
Loop are true thinkers, and they have came out with a product that has the Unix backbone,
a great GUI that will do just about anything anyone wants to do (given you purchase the
right software). I really like Linux because it is open source, and also because I have a
strong interest in networking and I will be doing that as a carreer (starting college in
the Fall). I will continue to use linux for servers and firewalls. There are sooo many
open source tools that make linux the choice for networking professionals (well, some use
other flavors of Unix such as Solaris.. which I will be taking classes for aswell).
I have one windows machine out of 5 that is two macs, two linux boxes and one windows
laptop. I will always have one windows machine, mostly for testing and such. People will
ALWAYS be using Windows as long as it is around, mostly because as it has been pointed out
when people go and buy a PC they are going to get a Windows machine, unless they get one
with Linux pre-installed, but that is fairly rare. I would like to see Microsoft improve
the operating system, instead of making it more and more bulky and releasing with sooo
many holes that need patching. I don't see that happening anytime soon.
I find
those who say that Windows is the best operating system, they generally don't know how to
use others, or they don't know the possibilities of other operating systems. Those who
tell me that Linux beats OS X they are 100% open source and so they won't touch stuff they
have to pay for. Maybe each group can provide some innovation, but out of the three I
would think that the Apple Users provide the most, as they really do "Think Different".
Steve
|
|
By nayrk on January 8, 2006 at 3:28 PM
man I got a great laugh from the vid (got the link from a Nintendo forum of all places
lol)
I am using a seven year old PowerBook G3 (333MHz w/192MB of RAM) and through
the years I've had very few cases of progys crashing (glares at MS Office) and yah know
what it still runs spiffy. SEVEN years old...most of my friends have a faster FSB than my
processer speed...and My comp almost always opens progys faster and its more reliable.
That is why I love mac so much. My little Lombard outclasses any windows machine
(given the windows machine is hooked up to the net for a few days lol) But hey I play
games on a console not on a computer so yea.
|
|
By JuggerNaut on January 8, 2006 at 3:42 PM
The Sidebar, and accompanying gadgets, are Microsoft's take on the Konfabulator
engine (I hate to break it to you but Apple didn't invent or popularize widgets, gadgets,
or whatever else you want to call these mini-applications).
I hate to break it
to you, but; the sidebar was/is a QNX feature of old and Konfabulator (created by Arlo
Rose -- an ex-Apple employee) is an evolved idea from the old Mac OS Desk Accessories
(mini apps).
Vista's 3D visual form and function are mix match of both Aqua and
Looking Glass (from Sun), so Microsoft has not really done anything all that exciting that
we haven't seen before elsewhere.
Pretty much everything Microsoft has done with
Vista is a rip off from some other operating system. Internet Explorer having a similar
look and feel to both Safari and Firefox. Representing RSS feeds exactly like Safari
(almost mirrored).
It doesn't matter, Vista will be outclassed again when Apple
releases Mac OS X Leopard and Microsoft will have to return to their photocopiers (I mean
drawing boards) for another decade!
|
|
By Stitch on January 8, 2006 at 4:00 PM
Anonimous does sound a lot like Ballmer.
Except he forgot to say "Give it up
for me!!!"
|
|
By Anonymous on January 8, 2006 at 4:09 PM
And in the end Apple with remain king of a niche market, with a small number of very
loyal users. And Microsoft will power almost all of the world's PCs.
AMEN.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 8, 2006 at 4:14 PM
Oh, and about the "deep penetration"... that's what mac fanboys must feel right in
their anal hole paying a couple of grand for a Mac.
|
|
By Someone on January 8, 2006 at 7:01 PM
Anonymous,
Mac owners generally don't mind what they've paid for their systems.
Macintosh systems have a much longer useful life (you can run Tiger perfectly well on a
five year old system), so TCO on a year-by-year basis is comparable if not actually a
little lower.
|
|
By rgury on January 8, 2006 at 7:10 PM
Anonymous,
Some people drive Geos. Some people drive BMWs. They all make it
to the grocery store. Only difference, you look like trash.
|
|
By rhsgolf on January 8, 2006 at 7:56 PM
"Oh, and about the "deep penetration"... that's what mac fanboys must feel right in
their anal hole paying a couple of grand for a Mac."
Thats kind of funny
considering a PC configured to the same specs as a PowerMac is generally within +/- $200
and I dare you to find a PC configured to the same specs as an Apple Quad 2.5 for the same
price.
|
|
By Cbigfoot on January 8, 2006 at 8:26 PM
The reason mac is so good is in order for any system change it requires a user password
so there is almost no way for a virus to get through with out you knowing!!!!!!! Also the
reason not many games are on mac is because they look like shit because microoft is
shit!!!!
|
|
By Smitty on January 8, 2006 at 10:04 PM
"If Apple does it better... than please explain why it's not as popular as MS and
Windows."
I think there are various elements of all the above mentioned reasons
for Microsoft's majority position, but the big one to me is that many companies have
invested huge amounts of money into the Microsoft technology. In order for them to change,
the Information Technology manager (CTO/CIO, whatever) would have to go to their board of
directors, hat in hand, and say, "I screwed up. We shouldn't have gotten so heavily
dependant on a less-secure and more arcane computing platform. We can end all our IT woes
by converting to Macintosh, downsizing our staff 75%, and lower the training budget for
all our remaining staff by 50%. Since I'd then be managing fewer people, I'll take a pay
cut as well."
Friends, that just isn't going to happen - not until those folks
retire, and a new, clearer-thinking generation takes over. Unless they're all of the
mindset of anonymous and the other gamers who love to hack hardware.
|
|
By Krig on January 8, 2006 at 11:05 PM
All the OSes out there have their distinct advantages and disadvantages over one
another, in the end it really comes down to personal preference.
It is of course
amusing to watch fanboys argue about why their system is better.
|
|
By macmanitou on January 9, 2006 at 1:57 AM
" The only reason you don't have so many worms, viruses, etc. on Macs is the same
reason you can't get the amount of software that's available for MS-based systems - nobody
wants to program for the Mac, not even virus creators."
ROFL,
for this and
all other virus statements - you are no programmer right? Visual Basic or what is your
favorite language. If you are a real hacker you can do stuff on every platform in a
breeze. So fuck the shut up and start learning to program your system. Dont waste your
time with playing lousy games and thinking your system is superior (there is no superior
system) - only a superior user knowing how to work with an advanced system. So I hope you
all virus freaks get it in your head: if you can do a virus on windows you can do it also
on mac or linux - in fact if it is possible due to user ignorance, your social service or
"system" insecurties. Windows is really good at the later one :P. Mac OS X and most linux
distris are fixed and patched by most users before the crowd of windows users even would
know that there is a security hole for their platform. This is by all means a fact.
So go out and learn some stuff before you type so foolish things here!
|
|
By macewan on January 9, 2006 at 5:35 AM
agreed, that line of thought is incorrect for the most part
|
|
By noah on January 9, 2006 at 9:50 AM
Pretty much the entire life of Microsoft in the OS world has been a rip-off of
something else. From Bill gates paying a small fee for the rights or the original DOS then
packaging it as his own creation. To adding a GUI after Apple. To present day. Microsoft
always has been and always will be chasing and struggling behind Apple. Except in the
field of Faulty applications. As for usage, I'm a professional, when I want a tool tha
will work, when I need it as I need it, I will turn to a Mac. I can make a PC run the same
way but it will take time and money I'm not willign to spend.
Bottom line: Don't
be fooled by cheap imitations.
|
|
By john on January 9, 2006 at 3:22 PM
The "penetration level of MS Windows"? That sounds like pain to me. Who wants to be
penetrated when they're using a computer? But that's exactly what it feels like when I
have to dig into the Windows Registry to remove all the nasty stuff my clients accumulate
in normal web browsing. And you can probably guess which orifice, too.
You can
keep your penetration. I'll take the pleasure of using a Mac any day.
|
|
By shamttster on January 9, 2006 at 5:42 PM
Hah! Anonymous must've really blew his top!
People with self esteem issues
should never post to tech forums
|
|
By zeke on January 9, 2006 at 7:49 PM
there is ONE reason that osX does not have the market share as microsoft... Apple is a
hardware company! a fantastic os to run on very good hardware is part of the package.
|
|
By jamey on January 9, 2006 at 11:00 PM
Personally, I'm a former Windows admin, with a smattering of Netware, linux, Solaris,
Irix and even VMS under my professional belt. Now that I've left my 8 year IT career
behind me, I've gone almost entirely to OS X (I keep one lame Celeron 600 laptop with XP
on it, to run a couple of legacy apps on).
I didn't really get into Macs much
until OS X came along-- I was familiar (in an envious sort of way) with the reliability
and security of Unix, had tinkered a good bit with linux, and decided it took more time
than I was willing to commit to configure and run. OS X gave me that unix reliability and
security, with incredible ease-of-use.
To address the cost issues raised above:
Honestly, I'd love to get rid of my XP laptop, but I'm too cheap to buy anything over $500
(I run OS X.3 on a six-year old Lombard Powerbook G3, and OS X.4 on a Mac Mini and a 400
MHz G4 Sawtooth desktop-- none of which have acceptable speeds when running freeware Intel
emulators). I haven't paid more than $350 for a computer in over 5 years (and, yes, I run
OS X on three different boxes).
The thing I loved about the video, and the
point that I thought Eden made very well, is that the features that Bill Gates is
describing as bold innovations are all things that OS X has been doing for a while now.
As for the people who are asking "If OS X is better than Windows, then why does
Windows have all the market share"... well, I've got better thing to do than to teach
market theory to pedantic idiots.
|
|
By Bill on January 9, 2006 at 11:36 PM
"If Apple does it better... than please explain why it's not as popular as MS and
Windows."
Hmmmm I guess we should all run out and buy a Chevy Cavalier, they must
be better than a Mercedes or BMW, or Ferarri...Look how many other people use them!
Interesting fact Mr. Anonymous...Do some research, look up the name Sir Timothy "Tim"
John Berners-Lee, maybe check out his choice of computer when he was busy inventing the
internet, go on don't be scared!
|
|
By Anonymous on January 10, 2006 at 12:00 AM
Except that Chevorlet doesn't have $40 in their bank and Mercedes or BMW weren't helped
by Chevy when they (in the not so distant future) faced bankruptcy.
So, again...
keep driving your Mercedes or BMW and paying $200 for an oil change... meanwhile I'll
stick with my 2K6 Civic... err... Vista.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 10, 2006 at 12:01 AM
That's $40 BILLION. My bad.
|
|
By Bill on January 10, 2006 at 12:17 AM
Funny that Apple stock is trading at $76.05 and Microsoft at $26.86 Interesting...
And you're right Mercedes had cheap labour from a certain ethnic group during the
war.
And you're right Microsoft is better and Apple is garbage. There now what
would you like to complain about ?
Is listening to all those noisey fans
irritating you?
|
|
By FUBAR on January 10, 2006 at 12:24 AM
Honestly, who cares! Why do people keep comparing a harware company with a software
company. I used to have a iBook but ditched it after it crashed 3 times in the first hour
of owning it. This while I was on the phone with Apple Care while they were trying to
figure out why my modem wouldn't work. After about an hour and half, and having to reboot
into some UGLY OS (I think it was OS 9.x) several times to change settings, Apple Care
told me to send it for repair. On the other hand I purchased a Dell with a loose key, and
I had a service tech in my livingroom within 4 hours with a new keyboard. I have had 5
computers with XP and not a single one has EVER crashed in 3 years. WTF.
|
|
By OBdaDa on January 10, 2006 at 12:34 AM
Great viDeo Great DiscuSSioN
|
|
By Anonymous on January 10, 2006 at 12:43 AM
OS/2 FTW.
Also, Jesus was black.
|
|
By slickfire on January 10, 2006 at 2:55 AM
jeez....some people can't take a joke...i stopped reading after like the 5th comment
it's just a fun project with some humor....
|
|
By frankielinked on January 10, 2006 at 4:25 AM
How many Microsoft presentations ended with lots of egg-on-face when the Windows system
crashed ? Quite a few . Bill Gates personally hosted several of them! Videos available all
over the web. Now if a Microsoft marketing presentation regularly ends abruptly in blue
screens or system crashes , is that not a deterrent ? No , it is not because everybody
seems to love blue screens and system crashes in their office or living room .So , you get
exactly what you see when you watch them presenting their products. At least they are
honest about themselves...
|
|
By Anonymous on January 10, 2006 at 4:29 AM
No, you're the one that's stupid!
|
|
By frankielinked on January 10, 2006 at 4:35 AM
I guess I shall have to dust off my old PC to decrypt the 4:29 AM posting by Anonymous.
I will take me just about three hours to get it up and running .
|
|
By Viruses on January 10, 2006 at 7:59 AM
Funny... I would almost buy that "apple is too small for people to want to write
viruses for"... but is there seem to be several people here that hate mac users enough to
do it... so... that can't be it.
|
|
By john on January 10, 2006 at 10:21 AM
So I guess this whole discussion has finally descended to its true level. A person
who's too cowardly to use his name (Anonymous) firing back with the infantile "No, you're
the one that's stupid!"
How do the rest of you feel knowing you're arguing with a
child? I know how I feel.
|
|
By Noah on January 10, 2006 at 11:23 AM
I was actually wondering what his age was. Education level might have somethign to do
with it to.
|
|
By Deepdiver on January 10, 2006 at 2:24 PM
Why does MS have better market penetration? IMO it goes back 20 years. Reaching
wwaaaayyyy back to the popular advent of the PC, Apple won beating out Atari, Commodore,
etc. All of us in computer classes in elementary and secondary schools in the early
through mid-80s knew how to use Apples and the first Macs. IBM started pushing DOS apps
for business but those of us graduating HS in the mid-80s all preferred Macs because of
our comfort level. And then Mac screwed up. The tried to become a beautique product.
Wanna buy an IBM compatible computer? There were 20 local computer stores in any decent
sized town. Wanna buy a Mac? Good luck finding a store that sells them. But why?
I was involved in a local computer business venture in 1989. If you wanted to sell IBM
compatible computers (as they were called then - it was either IBM compat or Mac), related
hardware, software, peripherals, etc. all you needed was a little capital, a little
knowledge, a workbench, an advertisement and a catalog from 3-4 vendors to buy all
hardware/software needed. But, if instead you wanted to sell Macs you needed (remember
this is 1989) $50,000.00 to franchise. THEN they had to approve your store, your
advertising campaign, and a bunch of other stuff. At that time, in a Midwest town of
12,000 people, Mac told us that franchisement, setup and inventory (they required a
specific level of inventory) would cost about $150,000 PLUS operating capital. Also, if
you weren't a Mac franchisee you couldn't buy Mac products wholesale so you couldn't
reasonably sell them and make any money.
So there it happened. Every town in
America had at least one IBM compatible, MS-DOS based computer store and very few places
had Mac stores because of the cost of setting up the business. You could start an
MS-DOS/IBM business on a shoestring budget. This made MS-DOS/IBM machines VERY available
to the public. And even if you travelled 150 miles to get a Mac, you had to travel that
sime 150 miles every time you needed anything for it.
By the time of the rise of
the internet and easy accessibility of vendors regardless of location, the war was lost.
Mac became what it was misguidedly trying to be in the late 80's, a beautique computing
system.
MS might still have held sway in the business world, however, I think that
Mac, if they hadn't been such arrogant wienies in the 80s could have won the home PC
battles and maybe by now the war even in offices.
As it is, I use Microsoft OSs
and have since the late 80s when it was so much more accessible than Mac. I think that MS
generally sucks and has crappy products and I have absolutely NO interest in migrating to
Vista when it is released. I'll stick with Win 98 (legacy machine for when I need DOS
support) and XP until I just can't anymore for some reason. I don't trust the intrusion
of MS into the DCRM fray and what they are going to be monitoring on my computer just for
starters. Secondly, I got XP right after it was released and had 2 total crashes in the
first month due to "unpublished" glitches that MS hadn't got around to fixing yet and
didn't want to admit publicly.
Still, I don't forsee migrating to Mac. My
proprietary business production software is not Mac compatible and I expect that tens of
thousands of dollars in other software and hardware I have isn't either.
The
videos were hilarious though. I always enjoy an opportunity to laugh at a company that
has brought me so much pain, misery and aggravation over the years.
|
|
By Tour guide on January 10, 2006 at 2:48 PM
"And please back your theories with facts, you're practically the first person I have
heard saying that "the trend is away from Microsoft and towards Apple"
Fine,
here's some facts:
"The company's revenue totaled $5.7 billion in its fiscal first
quarter, which ended in December, up from $3.5 billion a year earlier, he said. The
company sold 14 million iPods, up from 4.5 million a year earlier." -- http://tinyurl.com/e2l59 [nytimes.com]
Apple's stock popped over $80. Yeah, I'm excited, but really, I just want one of
these:
http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/
|
|
By Noah on January 10, 2006 at 3:46 PM
Yeah those are pretty... the 15" only thing baffles me though.
|
|
By Ash on January 10, 2006 at 5:04 PM
I've always been a windows baby, I was playing DOS games back when commander keen and
duke nukem were the latest side scrollers, when i was too young to 'get' wolfy3D. I grew
up from DOS to Win3.11, then through almost every version of windows. I had this ingrown
despise for mac. Then i got an iBook this christmas.
Never goin back to windows.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 10, 2006 at 6:44 PM
I used amiga, windows, macosX and Linux, and right now I'm using windows. There's no
need to be religous about your os. All of them have weakneses but windows has more.
|
|
By ldenman on January 10, 2006 at 7:55 PM
Dear Anonymous, On Behalf of Everyone Here at MacLive.Net, I Request that You,
SirNewbissMcgee, Leave This Forum or Go ahead and Give in to the Fact that EVERYONE here
PWNED YOU LIKE WOAH! I seriously doubt that you have actually USED OSX. If you did, you
probably were not able to understand the dock menu, finder, or maybe even the trash bin.
Its alright though, Ignorance(stupidity) is Bliss. We just want to help to open your eyes
to something new and amazing .
Here is something that may help you out: http://www.apple.com/switch
Please Read The Information. Especially the Comments on the right side.
In Christ,
Ldenman
ps. Are you stating that Windows has more weakness than osx and
linux? If not, i would rephrase that.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 10, 2006 at 8:35 PM
That sounds like a different anonymous, actually. If I do this right I should be
anonymous too... its Noah actually.
|
|
By neo on January 11, 2006 at 12:19 AM
The reason Windows is popular over Apple is because of a simple business decision.
Windows was a cheap way to get tens of millions of useless computers to be usefull once
again.
Like anything in Life we either choose to go for the really great things
and pay to ride the Ferrari or we get on the good ol Chevy and go for a spin.
Don't get all in a fuss about it. Apple does make far better technology than Microsoft
ever will dream of doing but that doesn't change the fact that people are dumbfucks that
would choose to buy a piece into the marketing bullshit that is fed to them.
That's why we chose use vhs instead of the far better beta back in the day and guess what
Beta is still the Broadcast industry standard to this day and vhs is dying. I'm sure if
the dumbasses at Sony would have licensed beta for the movie and porn industry it would be
a different story.
Most of the population in this Planet are suckers for a great
marketing bullshit story. That's how we were sold a War in Iraq my fellows. So chin up....
Vista has more problems up ahead. One major one is the fact that it's a processor and ram
hog.
I'll keep my mac for now thank you!
|
|
By SybAGreY on January 11, 2006 at 2:42 AM
SOMEBODY HELP ME GET OFF THESE MAILING LISTS.
In the email I get, it says "To
stop following this thread click here:" then doesn't give you anything to click.
I
can't remember which thread I'm subsribed to, but if somebody could assist in removing me
from all, that would be appreciated.
|
|
By zen on January 11, 2006 at 3:04 AM
windows sucks gorilla dong.
|
|
By Tour guide on January 11, 2006 at 3:23 AM
Likewise, I am offered no way to remove myself from the automated email notifications.
What gives?
|
|
By smanke on January 11, 2006 at 10:25 AM
I just posted Episode 3 of Eden's series. See the link at the end of the story above
for a link.
|
|
By Tour guide on January 12, 2006 at 4:42 AM
How to unsubscribe: the link is there; it's just hidden. Turn off HTML formatting of
your email and you'll see it.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 12, 2006 at 3:30 PM
ldenman:
Here's something that might help YOU,
http://mac-sucks.com/
|
|
By Anonymous on January 12, 2006 at 3:36 PM
"$5.7 billion"
How much is that in iPods?
|
|
By thunderer on January 15, 2006 at 2:10 PM
I am counting down the days until Vista ships... sometime near the end of 2006. How
will we pass the time?
|
|
By ldenman on January 15, 2006 at 10:58 PM
@ Anonymous... 1.OLLLLLDDDDDD!!!
and
2. How about supplying me with a
site that contains some validity...
You are probably some 13 year old kid who
thinks he is some Uber-Duber 1337 H4X0R! Well, Get on my level....bitched.
|
|
By Jonny on January 16, 2006 at 4:30 PM
I often wonder how many of these people criticising mac have ever used one...
You often notice that people will defend the thing they use (phone network, for example)
just because of the human trait of wanting to be the best.
On the other hand, I
doubt you'll see a mac user who hasn't tried windows, and just decided it's better.
My personal conclusions: Mac is a better OS in many ways.
As a computer for a
company, especially for graphics/web design/CAD-CAM companies, it is invariably found
better.
As a computer for home users, for things such as games, Windows is
superior - mainly due to it's popularity and wide range of games, mac has less; but i've
never crashed one ¬_¬
~Jon
|
|
By pIx on January 23, 2006 at 6:54 AM
Without the intention of getting into an OS battle, I just want to add productively and
state my reason for using Windows and not the Mac, even though I use a Mac all too often
in my Univ. Lab.
Hardware vise I now have an IBM Thinkpad that cost me $1977 that
I purchased this december, so price was not the issue.
As electrical engineers, we
need to use applications like Cadence (for circuits design), Microcontroller Programming
tools like Codewarior, IT Guru (computer network development tool), Mathcad (provided by
Univ). It is difficult for anyone in the engineering field to completely dispose windows.
Though, on a users stand point of view, I really like OSX over Windows and Apple
has got more things right in making the OS apealing to the user and the invaluable
advantage of seamless integration because they make the hardware & the software.
But windows also has its advantages. The high end oscilloscopes, network analysers and
some radars I worked with all use windows OS!! Its really amazing how much diverse
hardware they have managed to address with the same OS. But doing this requires a
install-driver type of approach, issues of unstability.
So to conclude, my chosen
line of profession benefits from windows as of now and I think both MacOS and WindowsOS
has their abilities & dis-abilities.
Cheers!
|
|
By Anonymous on January 23, 2006 at 7:10 AM
for a clissic Microsoft vs Apple difference, please take your time to watch http://www.microsoft.com/winme/0601/25904/CES_Keyn...
|
|
By Anonymous on January 23, 2006 at 7:54 AM
Gosh!! thank you for tat vista keynote link... Mcrosoft for total world domination.
Folks, Microsoft Windows is not only going to be inside your TV, Mobilephone, bathroom
mirror, kitchen, airport launge, regular home phone, car etc.. etc.. but they are all
going to be integrated to operate exchanging information with each other etc. etc... See
the keynote for more ifo.
Right now, if its only the computer, then MacOS may be
better, but soon Microsoft will be leaving Apple in the dust....
When Steeve Jobs
talk of the compnplace software, Gates's keynote is a demo of true science fiction.
No I am not a gates fac... just reflecting some reality here.
|
|
By Anonymous on January 25, 2006 at 8:06 AM
Jobs vs. Gates: Who's the Star?
http://www.wirednews.com/news/columns/0,70072-0.ht...
|
|
By bajaj on February 27, 2006 at 6:26 PM
Mac sucks !!! Its so difficult to work with just the keyboard !! and being a
programmer i need those shortcuts...and yest convenient shortcuts !!! Mac lacks those !!
Now dotn tell me that there are easier shortcuts in Macs than windows... also its hard to
control the windows... if you by mistake click you loose all those freakin file menus up
there i can list tons of flaws like this in MACS which limit the speed of your work !!
Also the ALT TAB thing that they tried to make like windows ..well it sucks in MAC>..coz
it just shows the application and not the actual windows... who the heck wants to see the
applications running instead of windows !!!
AND those who are dreeaming of Apple
taking up the majority of market share !! well forget about it !! its not gonna happen..!!
And viruses ...:-D
well well ... ALL the Mr. and Miss MACINTELS .... just
wait and watch !!!
:-D
you will be in virus hell soon ... if you dont
want to be ...then just pray that you dont catch the attention of hackers and virus
writers by over publicising your MACS !!!
|
|
By Karlos on May 26, 2006 at 2:19 AM
ok i stoped reading this eventaly cause it just kept saying the same thing over and
over. The mac fan boys are just angry cause despite everything when vista comes out 95% of
the world will get it and even if mac did have things before it they wont care becouse
they will have it on a familer computer. It dosnt matter if macs are better or not really
personly i dont think they are i have them for school and they never work recenlty they
all had to be recaled to wipe the hard disk thats over 600 computers!!!! I never have
problems with my home except once where i had hardwhere problems which was easly fixed for
not much cost since i could replace the hardwhere my self. Macs are pritty but you cant
exactly do much with them.. . oh expect hack the shit out of them ive seen people make
such a mess out of there school computers ussing a resticted acount and no other
softewhere that they took over 2 months to fix. and the school tecs couldnt fix them they
have to be sent away how conveiont eh? In either case when it comes right down to it the
market decides and you dont need to have market thero to work this one out.
btw im
sure some of you will want to attack my spelling as some sort of symble of my intengese so
just so you know im dislexic meaning im probly smarter than you!!!
|
|
By ex2bot on December 17, 2006 at 9:07 PM
Okay, people. Stop this bickering. Every operating system has advantages and drawbacks.
Can't we just all relax and have fun? No more silly arguing.
Because Macs are
better. ;)
Bot
|
|
By Mac USER -- Pc ABUSER on December 30, 2006 at 2:20 PM
Lol
Pcs-are-shit.
You gotta
Deal-with-it.
Lol,
that rhymes...
Theyre gona be going back to their copying machines everytime
Apple releases a new OS, Apple rocks, Pc sucks fat cock, deal with it, froobs.
PS.
Froobs = FReaky nOOBS
|
Load Time:
0.11 seconds
|